A SECRET WEAPON FOR CRIMINAL CASE INFORMATION ABOUT LAWS OF PAKISTAN

A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan

A Secret Weapon For criminal case information about laws of pakistan

Blog Article

We make no warranties or guarantees about the accuracy, completeness, or adequacy of your information contained on this site, or maybe the information linked to to the state site. Some case metadata and case summaries were written with the help of AI, which can make inaccuracies. You should read the full case before depending on it for legal research purposes.

In Dosso's case (1958), the Pakistan Supreme Court used jurist Hans Kelsen's theory that a revolution can be justified when The fundamental norm underlying a Constitution disappears in addition to a new system is put in its place.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have listened to the realized counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments because the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) of your Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 handy over possession on the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending as the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer during the Illegal Dispossession case and as far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court has to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises When the petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

The necessary analysis (called ratio decidendi), then constitutes a precedent binding on other courts; further analyses not strictly necessary towards the determination on the current case are called obiter dicta, which represent persuasive authority but usually are not technically binding. By contrast, decisions in civil legislation jurisdictions are generally shorter, referring only to statutes.[four]

This Court may well interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer inside of a manner inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the summary or finding arrived at by the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. When the conclusion or finding is for example no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may well interfere with the summary or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it acceptable on the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-recognize the evidence or perhaps the nature of punishment. About the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified by the decision from the Supreme Court within the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Read more

Since the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has long been attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to get taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

All executive and judicial authorities throughout Pakistan are obligated to act in support on the Supreme Court, making certain the enforcement of its judgments. Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been attained, the decision from the Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. Read more

Because of this, just citing the case is more likely to annoy a judge than help the party’s case. Imagine it as calling someone to inform them you’ve found their lost phone, then telling them you live in these kinds of-and-this kind of community, without actually providing them an address. Driving around the neighborhood endeavoring to find their phone is likely being more frustrating than it’s value.

, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling within the same sort of case.

Summaries provide an essential glimpse into the intricate landscape of Environment and Climate Laws in Pakistan. Delving into this realm unveils a mosaic of regulations and procedures aimed at safeguarding natural resources, mitigating environmental degradation, and combating climate change.

Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. For that reason, this petition is admissible based on set up court precedents, as well as respondents' objections are overruled. Read more

Problems or Errors In case you encounter any technical problems with this website (for instance a negative link or possibly a portion of the opinion lacking), please notify the eService Center.

17 . Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi 2025 SHC KHI forty six I have read the acquired counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments as being the issues of your matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard to your interim relief application in terms of Section seven(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises towards the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs for being decided by the competent court after hearing the parties if pending because the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer while in the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the check here trial court has to see this component for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and it is dismissed along with the pending application(s), plus the petitioners may well search for remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Report this page